As an alternative of utilizing fossil fuels, we’re instructed to make use of “clear” vitality: wind, photo voltaic, or hydropower.
Hydro is probably the most dependable. Not like wind and daylight, it flows steadily.
However now, environmental teams wish to destroy dams that create hydropower.
“Breach these dams,” an activist shouts in my new video. “Now’s the time, our fish are on the road!”
The activists have focused 4 dams on the Snake River in Washington state. They declare the dams are driving salmon to extinction.
It is true that dams as soon as killed plenty of salmon. Pregnant fish must swim upriver to have infants, and their infants swim downriver to the ocean.
All of the sudden, dams had been in the way in which.
Salmon inhabitants dropped sharply.
However that was within the Nineteen Seventies.
In the present day, most salmon make it previous the dam with out hassle.
How?
Fish-protecting improvements like fish ladders and spillways information many of the salmon away from the generators that generate electrical energy.
“Between 96 % and 98 % of the salmon efficiently cross every dam,” says Todd Myers, Environmental Director on the Washington Coverage Heart.
Even federal scientific companies now say we are able to depart dams alone and fish might be fantastic.
However environmental teams do not elevate cash by acknowledging good information.
“Snake River Salmon Are in Disaster,” reads a headline from Earthjustice.
Gullible media fall for it.
The Snake River is the “most endangered within the nation!” claimed the night information anchor.
“That is merely not true,” Myers explains. “All you need to do is take a look at the precise inhabitants numbers to know that that is absurd.”
Totally absurd. Lately, salmon populations are larger than they had been within the Eighties and 90s.
“They make these claims,” Myers says, “as a result of they know individuals will consider them….They do not wish to consider that their favourite environmental group is dishonest.”
However many are.
In 1999, environmental teams purchased an advert in The New York Instances saying “salmon…might be extinct by 2017.”
“Did the environmentalists apologize?” I ask Meyers.
“No,” he says. “They repeat nearly the very same arguments immediately. They simply modified the dates.
I invited 10 activist teams that wish to destroy dams to come back to my studio and defend their claims about salmon extinction. Not one agreed.
I perceive why. They’ve already satisfied the general public and gullible politicians.
Idaho’s Republican Congressman Mike Simpson says, “There isn’t a viable path that may enable us to maintain the dams in place.”
“We preserve doing dumb issues,” says Myers. “We put cash into locations the place it would not have an environmental influence, after which we marvel 10, 20, 30 years [later] why we have not made any environmental progress.”
Politicians and activists wish to tear down Snake River dams though they generate tons of electrical energy.
“Virtually the identical quantity as all the wind and photo voltaic generators in Washington state,” says Myers. “Think about if I instructed the environmental group we have to tear down each wind turbine and each photo voltaic panel. They’d lose their minds. However that is primarily what they’re advocating by tearing down Snake River dams.”
I push again: “They are saying, ‘Simply construct extra wind generators.'”
“The issue is, a number of occasions a yr, there is not any wind,” he replies. “You would construct 10 occasions as many wind generators, but when there is not any wind, there is not any electrical energy.”
Hydro, alternatively, “can activate and off each time it is wanted. Destroying hydro and changing it with wind makes completely no sense. It should do critical injury to our electrical grid.”
“It isn’t their cash,” I level out.
“Precisely,” he says. “If you wish to spend $35 billion on salmon, there’s plenty of issues we are able to do that may have an actual influence.”
Like what?
“[Reduce the population of] seals and sea lions,” he says, “The Washington Academy of Sciences says that except we scale back the populations, we won’t recuperate salmon.”
“Folks used to hunt sea lions,” I be aware.
“Yeah, that is why the populations are larger immediately.”
However environmentalists don’t need individuals to hunt sea lions or seals. As an alternative, they push for destruction of dams.
“As a result of it is horny and dramatic, it sells,” says Myers. “It is extra about feeling good than environmental outcomes.”
COPYRIGHT 2024 BY JFS PRODUCTIONS INC.
