ADVERTISEMENT
Senator Marco Rubio introduced yesterday his rejection of the G20 Summit in Johannesburg and confirmed that he is not going to attend.
The G20 Summit is an annual assembly of the leaders of the world’s 20 largest economies. Its purpose is to coordinate world financial and monetary insurance policies, addressing points resembling financial progress, commerce, funding, monetary stability, local weather change, and safety.
The G20 (Group of 20) consists of 19 nations and the European Union, together with main powers such because the U.S., China, Russia, Germany, and Brazil. Moreover, particular visitors and worldwide organizations just like the IMF and the UN usually take part.
This 12 months, one of the vital controversial matters on the G20 is the latest Expropriation Legislation signed by South African President Cyril Ramaphosa in January.
The regulation permits the state to expropriate land to handle racial inequalities in property possession, a legacy of apartheid.
Supporters argue that this regulation will assist scale back racial disparities in land possession, a lingering consequence of apartheid, which resulted in 1994.
The South African authorities claims that the regulation doesn’t enable for arbitrary expropriation and that landowners should attain an settlement.
Within the context of the G20, the place leaders search to coordinate insurance policies to make sure sustained world financial progress, the approval of this South African regulation might turn into a central subject of dialogue.
Nonetheless, whereas some attempt to downplay the scenario, the truth is that South Africa is turning into a hostile state to Western rules, selling pressured expropriations, socialist globalism, and a transparent anti-American bias.
AfriForum, an advocacy group representing the pursuits of Afrikaans-speaking white South Africans, has reached out to Trump and the U.S. Congress, warning that property rights are in danger following the approval of the Expropriation Legislation.
The group additionally argues that white landowners mustn’t face racially unjust legal guidelines that might result in property confiscation, as there’s a widespread, politically motivated marketing campaign towards white farmers.
Pressured expropriation is all the time theft.
One in every of Rubio’s major causes for boycotting the G20 is South Africa’s land expropriation coverage with out compensation.
Though the regulation typically requires truthful compensation, it permits for sure instances the place no cost shall be made, so long as it’s deemed «simply and cheap.»
This measure not solely violates property rights but in addition remembers the worst episodes of Zimbabwe’s latest historical past, the place land confiscation led to financial collapse and famine.
This coverage has sparked outrage, and the Trump administration had already warned about the potential for financial sanctions towards South Africa if it continued with these abusive practices. Now, the U.S. is taking one other step by boycotting the upcoming G20 summit.
The Democratic Alliance (DA) has condemned the regulation, arguing that it removes essential limits on authorities energy.
«Whereas the Structure permits for reparations and restitution, together with land reform, we’ve critical reservations about each the procedural and substantive features of the regulation. We’re in discussions with our authorized group to formulate our case,» the DA acknowledged in a press launch.
A politicized G20: Globalism, DEI, and Anti-Americanism.
Rubio has additionally criticized the G20 Summit agenda, the place South Africa is pushing insurance policies primarily based on “solidarity, equality, and sustainability.”
These seemingly innocent phrases are literally globalist progressive codes used to impose leftist insurance policies: wealth redistribution, range, fairness, and inclusion (DEI) ideology, and local weather rules that hurt the West whereas benefiting China and different creating economies.
Rubio is not going to attend the G20 summit in Johannesburg because of South Africa’s “anti-American” agenda.
“My job is to advertise the nationwide pursuits of the US, to not waste taxpayer cash or indulge anti-American sentiment,” acknowledged the Secretary of State.
South Africa and BRICS: A U.S. Ally or an enemy?
South Africa is a member of BRICS, the bloc that features China, Russia, India, and Brazil, which seeks to exchange U.S. greenback dominance in world commerce. Its unconditional help for China and Russia ought to be a wake-up name for Washington.
Whereas the U.S. sends billions of {dollars} in help to South Africa, Cyril Ramaphosa’s authorities strengthens its ties with communist and authoritarian regimes.
Ought to the U.S. proceed funding an adversary?
Marco Rubio has finished the best factor by boycotting this summit. It is unnecessary for the U.S. to maintain funneling taxpayer cash to a rustic that promotes land theft, Marxism, and anti-Americanism.
South Africa is not a dependable ally—it has turn into a pawn of the anti-Western bloc.
It’s time for the U.S. to take a stronger stance: reduce financial help to South Africa, sanction its authorities, and strengthen relations with allies that really defend freedom and democracy.
About The Creator