Seems even essentially the most delusional, far-left Hollywood darlings could be proper twice a day.
(Sure, I do know that adage applies to a damaged clock, however evaluating a busted timepiece to actress Jamie Lee Curtis is an insult to the damaged clock.)
Now, in full equity, maybe this author is being a bit harsh.
Certain, Curtis is completely troubled with Trump Derangement Syndrome, and sure, she brazenly flaunts her baby affected by gender dysphoria.
However, to her infinitesimal credit score, regardless of the TDS and card-carrying membership within the LGBT mafia, Curtis is, in reality, an precise human being with a soul.
That won’t seem to be an particularly excessive bar to hurdle, however in the event you’ve been paying any consideration to the leftist response to the current assassination of Turning Level USA founder Charlie Kirk, that it’s a bar that swathes of America can’t appear to clear.
Nonetheless, Curtis did, and — once more, to her credit score — she did so by mentioning one of the crucial essential issues to Kirk and his legacy: religion.
In response to Fox Information, Curtis appeared on a podcast Monday and spoke about a variety of matters. A kind of matters included the lately deceased Kirk.
And whereas many really feel the necessity to eulogize Kirk with a “however,” Curtis did no such factor.
She as a substitute brazenly wept and broke down on the concept of a 31-year-old father and husband being violently killed in entrance of his spouse and youngsters. You recognize — a regular response to such a tragedy.
You possibly can hear the related alternate, courtesy of Trending Politics co-owner Collin Rugg, beneath:
Actress and movie producer Jamie Lee Curtis breaks down in tears over the dying of Charlie Kirk.
“I imply, I disagreed with him on virtually each level I ever heard him say…”
“However I consider he was a person of religion, and I hope in that second when he died, that he felt linked to… pic.twitter.com/Bhv2UZrMhU
— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) September 16, 2025
The bit (it’s not absolutely captured) begins with Curtis erroneously referring to Kirk as “Charlie Crist.”
“I’m sorry,” Curtis stated after being corrected by podcast host Marc Maron. “Kirk. I simply known as him Crist. I feel due to Christ. Due to his deep, deep perception.
“I imply, I disagreed with him on virtually each level I ever heard him say, however I consider he was a person of religion.”
It’s at this level that Curtis might barely comprise her feelings, as her voice quivered with sorrow as she continued to debate Kirk.
“And I hope in that second when he died, he felt linked to his religion, regardless that I discover what he … His concepts have been abhorrent to me, I nonetheless consider he was a father, a husband, and a person of religion, and I hope no matter connection to God means, that he felt it.”
Curtis would ultimately pivot to discussing 9/11 and the way People are simply continuously “bombarded” with damaging imagery, however her level — and response — to Kirk’s assassination was clear: No matter it’s possible you’ll consider Charlie Kirk, on the very least, no one deserves to lose their life in the way in which Kirk did.
Once more, credit score the place it’s due, Curtis’ response — “his concepts have been abhorrent” apart — is what many on the proper anticipated to see out of the left when Kirk was murdered in chilly blood.
As an alternative, we received individuals actually dancing on his grave and making up quotes wholesale to denigrate a deceased man’s beliefs.
So I posit this to Ms. Curtis within the off likelihood she ever sees this: Check out your fellow leftists celebrating his dying. Check out your individual religion.
Is it actually Charlie Kirk’s biblical beliefs which can be “abhorrent”? Or is it the individuals with whom you encompass your self?
This text appeared initially on The Western Journal.
