Over the last 12 months of Donald Trump’s first time period as president, drug-related deaths in the US rose by 30 %—the biggest annual enhance ever recorded. Throughout Joe Biden’s closing 12 months as president, in accordance with preliminary estimates reported final week, that dying toll fell by 27 %—one other file.
On the face of it, Biden did a much better job of waging the struggle on medication than Trump. However that conclusion credit presidents with rather more energy than they really must curtail substance abuse by attacking the provision of unlawful medication—an unattainable mission doomed by the economics of prohibition.
Legal professional Basic Pam Bondi lately claimed the Trump administration had “saved…258 million lives” by intercepting shipments of illicit fentanyl. Whereas Bondi’s risible math broke new floor, it mirrored her boss’s simpleminded religion within the struggle on medication.
“I’ll create borders,” Trump promised throughout his 2016 marketing campaign. “No medication are coming in….Consider me, I’ll remedy the issue.”
Trump didn’t, in truth, remedy the issue. By the top of his first time period, the annual quantity of drug deaths was 44 % increased than it was the 12 months earlier than he took workplace.
That sorry file didn’t cease Trump from bragging, throughout his 2024 marketing campaign, that “we took the drug and fentanyl disaster head on” and “achieved the primary discount in overdose deaths in additional than 30 years.” He was referring to a 4 % drop in 2018, after which the dying toll resumed its upward development.
Throughout his first State of the Union handle in 2022, Biden promised that he would “beat the opioid epidemic” and “cease the move of illicit medication.” But the annual variety of overdose deaths reached a file excessive of almost 108,000 on his watch.
Nonetheless, if Trump can declare credit score for the 4 % drop in 2018, it appears solely honest to reward Biden for the comparable drop (3 %) in 2023 and the a lot greater drop in 2024. Likewise, if Biden deserves blame for permitting drug deaths to achieve the best stage ever seen, the identical logic condemns Trump, who presided over the unprecedented leap seen in 2020.
One thing could also be fallacious with that logic, which ignores the bigger forces at work in each circumstances. When it turned clear that overdoses had risen dramatically in 2020, consultants surmised that it had one thing to do with the social and financial disruption attributable to the COVID-19 pandemic and the federal government’s response to it—an impression confirmed by subsequent analysis.
A 2024 research discovered that “unstable drug use in the course of the COVID-19 pandemic was frequent, gave the impression to be pushed by structural vulnerability, and was related to elevated overdose threat.” One other research published the identical 12 months concluded that “insurance policies limiting in-person actions considerably elevated” drug dying charges.
If pandemic-related disruption drove the 2020 overdose spike, the return to regular life looks like a believable clarification for subsequent decreases, though the dying toll was nonetheless about 14 % increased final 12 months than it was in 2019. Final fall, College of North Carolina drug researcher Nabarun Dasgupta and his colleagues advised different doable components, together with wider availability of naloxone, an opioid antagonist that rapidly reverses overdoses.
Dasgupta et al. deemed it “unlikely” that makes an attempt to dam the drug provide—the answer favored by Trump and Biden, echoing an extended line of politicians—had performed a big function in lowering overdoses. That clarification, they famous, was inconsistent with the falling retail costs they’d noticed.
Removed from lowering drug-related hurt, prohibition aggravates it by making a black market the place drug composition is extremely variable and by encouraging the sale of particularly potent substances corresponding to fentanyl, that are simpler to smuggle. The crackdown on prescription opioids magnified these hazards by driving nonmedical customers to exchange reliably dosed prescription drugs with substitutes that had been rather more harmful.
Since Biden and Trump each supported these insurance policies, they each deserve blame for the predictably perverse penalties.
© Copyright 2025 by Creators Syndicate Inc.
