The USA authorities is doubling down on its efforts to maintain the true story of January 6, 2021, shrouded in secrecy, as evidenced by a current courtroom submitting opposing January 6 defendant Ryan Zink’s movement to carry a protecting order on discovery supplies. Filed on April 16, 2025, within the U.S. District Courtroom for the District of Columbia, the federal government’s 13-page transient claims that releasing these supplies would endanger “witnesses and victims” and threaten nationwide safety.
However a more in-depth look reveals a troubling narrative: the so-called “victims” are seemingly the Metropolitan and Capitol Law enforcement officials who escalated a peaceable protest into chaos, and the “witnesses” embody shadowy teams just like the “Sedition Hunters,” whose superior AI instruments increase extra questions than solutions. Ryan Zink, a pardoned J6 defendant now working for Congress, is decided to reveal the reality about that day and the relentless lawfare that adopted, however the authorities is pulling out all of the stops to silence him.
Thanks @gatewaypundit I’ll by no means cease combating for the American individuals not simply J6 defendants!!
Alea iacta est.https://t.co/Wz05X1FUug
— Ryan Zink for Congress TX-19 (@RyanZ4Congress) April 10, 2025
The Authorities’s Claims About “Victims” and “Witnesses”
The federal government’s submitting insists that the protecting order, which Zink seeks to carry, is critical to guard the privateness of “victims” and “witnesses” and to safeguard nationwide safety. However who’re these victims? The one believable candidates are the Metropolitan and Capitol Law enforcement officials who in lots of situations instigated violence on January 6 by launching tear fuel grenades and firing rubber bullets right into a peaceable crowd. Earlier than a single protester entered the Capitol, the scenario had already turned lethal: Kevin Greeson and Benjamin Phillips misplaced their lives, Matthew Joshua Black was shot within the face with a rubber bullet, and Derrick Vargo narrowly escaped loss of life by the hands of a Capitol Police officer who pushed him from a 30-foot ledge. These are the actual victims of January 6, but the federal government’s narrative conveniently ignores them, focusing as an alternative on defending the officers who set the stage for tragedy.
The “witnesses” the federal government seeks to defend embody the enigmatic “Sedition Hunters,” a gaggle that operated with subtle synthetic intelligence instruments lengthy earlier than such expertise was broadly accessible commercially. These instruments allowed them to establish January 6 defendants, like Antoine Williams, primarily based on minute particulars akin to a definite key fob. Little is thought concerning the Sedition Hunters, their funding, or their connections to federal businesses, however their means to wield cutting-edge AI raises suspicions about their position within the authorities’s January 6 investigations. Are these the “witnesses” the federal government is so determined to guard? In that case, the general public deserves to know why.
Ryan Zink’s Ordeal and Quest for Reality
Ryan Zink’s story is a microcosm of the injustice confronted by January 6 defendants. On September 13, 2023, a D.C. jury convicted Zink of the unbeatable 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(2) cost—obstruction of an official continuing—together with two misdemeanors. He was sentenced to 3 months in federal jail and 12 months of oppressive supervised launch, with circumstances so restrictive they stripped him of primary freedoms. After serving his time, the Supreme Courtroom remanded the 1512(c)(2) cost, leaving Zink with solely misdemeanors—however the injury was finished. His life was upended, his popularity tarnished, and the federal government’s relentless prosecution left scars that no pardon can erase.
Zink was amongst these pardoned by President Trump. Now free, he’s working for Congress and has vowed to uncover the reality about January 6 and the 4 years of presidency lawfare that adopted. His movement to carry the protecting order is a crucial step in that mission, looking for to make public the terabytes of discovery supplies that would reveal the extent of presidency overreach, together with the position of undercover authorities brokers recognized to have been within the crowd that day. However the authorities is combating tooth and nail to maintain these supplies beneath wraps, claiming they comprise delicate data important to nationwide safety—with out offering any compelling specifics.
The Hypocrisy of “Defending Private Data”
The federal government’s concern for the private data of “witnesses and victims” rings hole when contrasted with its therapy of January 6 defendants. The Justice Division issued press releases for each J6 case, even for senior residents charged with minor misdemeanors, broadcasting their names and prices to the world with no regard for his or her presumption of innocence. Native media retailers eagerly picked up these tales, destroying lives, costing defendants their jobs, and alienating them from family and friends. But now, the federal government claims that releasing discovery supplies would violate the privateness of others. The place was this concern for privateness when J6 defendants had been being publicly vilified?
The “Settlement” to the Protecting Order: A Pressured Selection
The federal government’s submitting notes that Zink “agreed” to the protecting order, implying he willingly consented to maintaining these supplies secret. It is a gross misrepresentation. Within the U.S. justice system, such “agreements” are sometimes coercive. Defendants like Zink confronted a take-it-or-leave-it ultimatum: settle for the protecting order or be denied entry to the federal government’s proof in opposition to them. If Zink had refused, the courtroom would have imposed the order anyway, leaving him unable to arrange a protection. This isn’t settlement; it’s coercion dressed up as consent, a typical tactic within the authorities’s playbook to manage the narrative.
Nationwide Safety or Cowl-Up?
The federal government’s invocation of “nationwide safety” to justify the protecting order is equally suspect. The submitting vaguely references the necessity to shield Capitol surveillance footage and Secret Service protocols however presents no concrete examples of how releasing these supplies would endanger the nation. Might this be an try to hide the presence of FBI brokers within the January 6 crowd, a indisputable fact that has lengthy been whispered about however by no means totally addressed? The federal government’s refusal to offer specifics solely fuels hypothesis that “nationwide safety” is a pretext for overlaying up its personal misconduct.
A Curious Signature and a Glimmer of Hope?
The transient is signed by Jennifer Blackwell, a J6 prosecutor concerned in practically 40 January 6 instances. Notably, the identify of Edward Robert Martin, Jr., the U.S. Legal professional for the District of Columbia appointed by President Trump, seems unsigned on the doc. The submitting concludes:
The occasions of January 6, and the following investigations and prosecutions, are necessary to our historical past as a nation—occasions that have to be thought of by means of applicable public entry to authorities information and thru public discourse. However felony discovery is just not the suitable mechanism to vindicate that curiosity. Lifting the invention protecting order would lead to vital hurt to the safety of our nation and to numerous others.
The Street Forward
Zink’s movement is earlier than Decide James E. Boasberg, whose observe file suggests he’ll nearly actually aspect with the federal government. However Zink, alongside J6 investigators like these at The Gateway Pundit and his lawyer Roger Roots, stays undeterred. Their battle isn’t just for Zink however for the American public, which deserves to know what actually occurred on January 6 and within the years of lawfare that adopted. Ryan Zink’s battle is way from over. As he campaigns for Congress and fights for transparency, he carries the torch for numerous J6 defendants whose lives had been shattered by a weaponized justice system.
