0.5 C
New York
Thursday, February 6, 2025

America goes broke. Will the Division of Authorities Effectivity assist?


The Division of Authorities Effectivity (DOGE) has began making strikes.

The D.C. media are livid about his makes an attempt to chop authorities businesses.

However I take Elon Musk’s aspect.

Extra environment friendly authorities has been promised typically. It is by no means occurred.

As an alternative, authorities simply grew.

Sen. Rand Paul (R–Ky.) showcases silly authorities “investments” just like the $118,000 examine of finger snapping, which the Nationwide Science Basis mentioned was “impressed by the notorious finger snap of the [comic book] villain ‘Thanos.'” The federal government concluded that “various levels of friction between the fingers alters…efficiency of a snap.”

Gee, thanks.

They even spent 1000’s of {dollars} to check whether or not Neil Armstrong, touchdown on the moon, mentioned: “One small step for man,” or “one small step for a man.”

NASA says no “a” is audible within the recordings, and I by no means heard an “a,” however all of us paid for an costly examine during which the Science Basis concluded, “Ambiguity exists.”

Gee, thanks.

In addition they spent $1.5 million to check methods to enhance the style of tomatoes. Researchers discovered that sugar helps.

America goes broke. Foolish wealthy folks ought to fund such frivolous analysis. Taxpayers should not.

However every particular curiosity will combat for its life, and even when Musk cuts all such funding, it will barely have an effect on our ever-increasing deficit.

Let’s take a look at greater cuts:

In my new video, Chris Edwards, editor of the Cato Institute’s “Downsizing Authorities” web site, says, “The very first thing I might reduce is over a trillion {dollars} in subsidies to states and native governments—Ok-12 college funding, college lunch funding, meals stamp funding.”

Giving folks meals stamps sounds sort, however Edwards notes that, “Taxpayers fund sweet and cake,” and when “state governments ask to eradicate junk meals…they don’t seem to be allowed to.”

Actually. States aren’t allowed to restrict welfare funds for junk meals.

Edwards additionally proposes cuts to company welfare: “Federal authorities spends $180 billion a yr subsidizing firms…however that does not assist the common particular person.”

Extra might be saved by promoting the federal government’s stockpile of “an unbelievable 300,000 buildings.”

Many sit empty. Those in my video look top notch, however authorities nonetheless will not promote them.

Nor do bureaucrats promote land they do not use. The federal authorities owns rather a lot, together with most of the land in America’s west.

“We do not know the market worth,” says Edwards, “It’s within the trillions.”

As an alternative of promoting, politicians print more cash and use it to purchase much more land, like Biden’s latest buy of 640 acres in Wyoming.

President Donald Trump says he’ll make cuts. Will he? Final time he did not.

This time he appears extra critical about it.

He lately moved to finish Range, Fairness, and Inclusion (DEI) packages, telling federal DEI employees, “Do not are available.”

However he is nonetheless paying them!

“It is very tough to fireplace federal employees,” Edwards factors out.

Additionally, even when Trump managed to fireplace each federal worker, it nonetheless would not eradicate the deficit.

It is virtually unattainable to do this with out chopping the most important spending—protection, Medicare, Social Safety. Thus far, Trump says he will not contact these.

“Trump doesn’t have to unravel all the deficit drawback in his 4 years in workplace,” says Edwards, “however he is obtained to get the ball rolling.”

Authorities does not must steadiness the funds. If it simply slowed spending development, the personal economic system would possibly develop sufficient to scale back our debt.

However how can the personal sector develop when there are such a lot of rules?

“SpaceX needed to do a examine to see if Starship would hit a shark,” Musk complains. He says he advised the regulators, “It is a massive ocean, you realize? There’s a whole lot of sharks. It isn’t unattainable.”

When regulators lastly dropped their shark objections, Musk thought the SpaceX launch was authorised. “We mentioned, ‘OK, now we’re executed.’ They usually mentioned, ‘What about whales?…If the rocket goes underwater, then explodes, and the whales have listening to injury?’ That is actual! It goes on and on.”

Perhaps Musk will change that. Hope so. To beat our ruinous deficits, we’d like development. To get that, we’d like much less authorities spending and fewer guidelines.

COPYRIGHT 2025 BY JFS PRODUCTIONS INC.

Related Articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Articles