On a Friday in March 2021, Brian Moore, an aspiring rap artist, was about to catch a flight from Atlanta to Los Angeles, the place he deliberate to supply a video that he hoped would promote his musical profession. To pay for the video, he was carrying $8,500 in money, cash he had inherited from his late grandfather.
Federal drug brokers put an finish to Moore’s plan by taking his cash, which they vaguely alleged was linked indirectly to unlawful drug exercise. What occurred subsequent illustrates the significance of authorized safeguards towards the risks posed by civil forfeiture, a system of legalized larceny that authorizes regulation enforcement companies to pad their budgets by seizing supposedly crime-tainted belongings with out submitting prison costs, not to mention acquiring a conviction.
Whereas profit-motivated regulation enforcement companies are likely to painting it as inherently suspicious, there may be nothing unlawful about touring with giant sums of money. And though the federal government claimed a drug-detecting canine “alerted” to Moore’s cash, that’s much less incriminating than it sounds, since analysis has discovered that most U.S. foreign money accommodates traces of cocaine.
The federal government’s proof was so weak that it determined to drop the case after Moore challenged the seizure in federal court docket. Moore acquired his a refund, however he was nonetheless out hundreds of {dollars} in authorized charges till final week, when the U.S. Courtroom of Appeals for the eleventh Circuit dominated that he was entitled to compensation for these bills.
In contrast to prison defendants, civil forfeiture targets haven’t any proper to court-appointed counsel, which helps clarify why they often surrender with out a struggle. In line with one estimate, greater than 9 out of 10 federal civil forfeiture instances are resolved with out judicial involvement.
Difficult a forfeiture is a sophisticated and daunting course of that may be very troublesome to navigate with out a lawyer. However the price of hiring one sometimes exceeds the worth of the seized property, which means forfeiture targets can lose even after they win.
Congress tried to handle that drawback by passing the Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act (CAFRA), a 2000 regulation that claims “america shall be accountable for cheap legal professional charges” every time a property proprietor “considerably prevails” in a federal forfeiture case. However when Moore acquired his a refund and sought $15,000 to pay his attorneys, U.S. District Decide Thomas W. Thrash Jr. dominated that he was not entitled to compensation beneath CAFRA as a result of he had not met that commonplace.
Beneath Moore’s contingency charge settlement together with his attorneys, that call left him on the hook for one-third of the cash he had recovered. However with professional bono assist from the Institute for Justice, Moore appealed Thrash’s ruling, and a three-judge eleventh Circuit panel unanimously concluded that the choose had misapplied CAFRA.
The federal government’s prospects of profitable at trial had been so iffy that the Justice Division requested Thrash to dismiss the case with prejudice, precluding any future try to confiscate his cash. In line with the eleventh Circuit, that judicially endorsed final result was sufficient to conclude that Moore had “considerably prevail[ed].”
“We’re happy to see Brian made entire after years of litigation, however his case highlights the abusive civil forfeiture ways utilized by the federal authorities, which is able to litigate a case towards a property proprietor for years after which voluntarily dismiss the case on the eve of the federal government’s defeat,” says Institute for Justice Senior Lawyer Dan Alban. “With out the power to recuperate their attorneys’ charges after victory, most property house owners can’t afford to defend their property from forfeiture”—a actuality that motivated the “essential protections for property rights” that Congress accredited in 2000.
“It is an enormous reduction to have the court docket agree that I ought to get all my a refund,” Moore says. “Regardless that the federal government could not say what I did improper and dropped the case, I used to be going to lose hundreds of {dollars}. I hope that my victory can pave the best way for others to get justice with out paying a worth.”
© Copyright 2025 by Creators Syndicate Inc.
