The Historical past of AD-X2, the Battery Additive That Roiled NBS

Senate hearings, a submit workplace ban, the resignation of the director of the Nationwide Bureau of Requirements, and his reinstatement after greater than 400 scientists threatened to resign. Who knew slightly field of salt might fire up such drama?

What was AD-X2?

It began in 1947 when a bulldozer operator with a sixth grade schooling, Jess M. Ritchie, teamed up with UC Berkeley chemistry professor Merle Randall to advertise AD-X2, an additive to increase the lifetime of lead-acid batteries. The issue of those rechargeable batteries’ dwindling capability was well-known. If AD-X2 labored as marketed, hundreds of thousands of automotive homeowners would lower your expenses.

Jess M. Ritchie demonstrates his AD-X2 battery additive earlier than the Senate Choose Committee on Small Enterprise.Nationwide Institute of Requirements and Expertise Digital Collections

A fundamental lead-acid battery has two electrodes, one in every of lead and the opposite of lead dioxide, immersed in dilute sulfuric acid. When energy is drawn from the battery, the chemical response splits the acid molecules, and lead sulfate is deposited within the answer. When the battery is charged, the chemical course of reverses, returning the electrodes to their unique state—virtually. Every time the cell is discharged, the lead sulfate “hardens” and fewer of it might dissolve within the sulfuric acid. Over time, it flakes off, and the battery loses capability till it’s useless.

By the Thirties, so many corporations had provide you with battery components that the U.S. Nationwide Bureau of Requirements stepped in. Its lab assessments revealed that almost all have been variations of salt mixtures, reminiscent of sodium and magnesium sulfates. Though the components would possibly assist the battery cost quicker, they didn’t lengthen battery life. In Might 1931, NBS (now the Nationwide Institute of Requirements and Expertise, or NIST) summarized its findings in Letter Round No. 302: “No case has been discovered through which this elementary response is materially altered by means of these battery compounds and options.”

After all, innovation by no means stops. Entrepreneurs stored bringing new battery components to market, and the NBS stored testing them and discovering them ineffective.

Do battery components work?

After World Struggle II, the Nationwide Higher Enterprise Bureau determined to replace its personal publication on battery components, “Battery Compounds and Options.” The publication included a March 1949 letter from NBS director Edward Condon, reiterating the NBS place on components. Previous to heading NBS, Condon, a physicist, had been affiliate director of analysis at Westinghouse Electrical in Pittsburgh and a advisor to the Nationwide Protection Analysis Committee. He helped arrange MIT’s Radiation Laboratory, and he was additionally briefly a part of the Manhattan Undertaking. Evidently, Condon was aware of normal practices for analysis and testing.

In the meantime, Ritchie claimed that AD-X2’s secret components set it other than the a whole bunch of different components available on the market. He satisfied his senator, William Knowland, a Republican from Oakland, Calif., to jot down to NBS and request that AD-X2 be examined. NBS declined, not out of any prejudice or unwell will, however as a result of it examined merchandise solely on the request of different authorities businesses. The bureau additionally had a longstanding coverage of not naming the manufacturers it examined and never permitting its findings for use in commercials.

AD-X2 consisted primarily of Epsom salt and Glauber’s salt.Nationwide Institute of Requirements and Expertise Digital Collections

Ritchie cried foul, claiming that NBS was maintaining new companies from coming into {the marketplace}. Merle Randall launched an aggressive correspondence with Condon and George W. Vinal, chief of NBS’s electrochemistry part, extolling AD-X2 and the testimonials of many customers. In its responses, NBS patiently identified the distinction between anecdotal proof and rigorous lab testing.

Enter the Federal Commerce Fee. The FTC had acquired a criticism from the Nationwide Higher Enterprise Bureau, which suspected that Pioneers, Inc.—Randall and Ritchie’s distribution firm—was making false promoting claims. On 22 March 1950, the FTC formally requested NBS to check AD-X2.

By then, NBS had already extensively examined the additive. A chemical evaluation revealed that it was 46.6 p.c magnesium sulfate (Epsom salt) and 49.2 p.c sodium sulfate (Glauber’s salt, a horse laxative) with the rest being water of hydration (water that’s been chemically handled to kind a hydrate). That’s, AD-X2 was related in composition to each different additive available on the market. However, due to its coverage of not disclosing which manufacturers it assessments, NBS didn’t instantly announce what it had realized.

The David and Goliath of battery components

NBS then did one thing uncommon: It agreed to disregard its personal coverage and let the Nationwide Higher Enterprise Bureau embody the outcomes of its AD-X2 assessments in a public assertion, which was revealed in August 1950. The NBBB allowed Pioneers to incorporate a dissenting remark: “These assessments weren’t run in accordance with our specification and due to this fact didn’t point out the worth to be derived from our product.”

Removed from being cowed by the NBBB’s assertion, Ritchie was energized, and his story was taken up by the mainstream media. Newsweek’s protection pitted an up-from-your-bootstraps David in opposition to an overreaching governmental Goliath. Commerce publications, reminiscent of Western Building Information and Batteryman, additionally revealed flattering tales about Pioneers. AD-X2 gross sales soared.

Then, in January 1951, NBS launched its up to date pamphlet on battery components, Round 504. As soon as once more, assessments by the NBS discovered no distinction in efficiency between batteries handled with components and the untreated management group. The Authorities Printing Workplace offered the round for 15 cents, and it was one in every of NBS’s hottest publications. AD-X2 gross sales plummeted.

Ritchie wanted a brand new area through which to problem NBS. He turned to politics. He referred to as on all of his distributors to jot down to their senators. Between July and December 1951, 28 U.S. senators and one U.S. consultant wrote to NBS on behalf of Pioneers.

Condon was shedding his capability to successfully symbolize the Bureau. Though the Senate had confirmed Condon’s nomination as director with out opposition in 1945, he was beneath investigation by the Home Committee on Un-American Actions for a number of years. FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover suspected Condon to be a Soviet spy. (To be honest, Hoover suspected the identical of many individuals.) Condon was repeatedly cleared and had the general public backing of many outstanding scientists.

However Condon felt the investigations have been turning into an excessive amount of of a distraction, and so he resigned on 10 August 1951. Allen V. Astin grew to become appearing director, after which everlasting director the next 12 months. And he inherited the AD-X2 mess.

Astin had been with NBS since 1930. Initially working within the electronics division, he developed radio telemetry methods, and he designed devices to review dielectric supplies and measurements. Throughout World Struggle II, he shifted to army R&D, most notably improvement of the proximity fuse, which detonates an explosive machine because it approaches a goal. I don’t suppose that work ready him for the political bombs that Ritchie and his supporters stored lobbing at him.

Mr. Ritchie virtually goes to Washington

On 6 September 1951, one other authorities company entered the fray. C.C. Garner, chief inspector of the U.S. Publish Workplace Division, wrote to Astin requesting one more take a look at of AD-X2. NBS dutifully submitted a report that the additive had “no helpful results on the efficiency of lead acid batteries.” The submit workplace then charged Pioneers with mail fraud, and Ritchie was ordered to look at a listening to in Washington, D.C., on 6 April 1952. Extra assessments have been ordered, and the listening to was delayed for months.

Again in March 1950, Ritchie had misplaced his greatest champion when Merle Randall died. In preparation for the listening to, Ritchie employed one other scientist: Keith J. Laidler, an assistant professor of chemistry on the Catholic College of America. Laidler wrote a critique of Round 504, questioning NBS’s objectivity and testing protocols.

Ritchie additionally received Harold Weber, a professor of chemical engineering at MIT, to agree to check AD-X2 and to work as an unpaid advisor to the Senate Choose Committee on Small Enterprise.

Life was about to get extra sophisticated for Astin and NBS.

Why did the NBS Director resign?

Making an attempt to place an finish to the Pioneers affair, Astin agreed within the spring of 1952 that NBS would conduct a public take a look at of AD-X2 in keeping with phrases set by Ritchie. As soon as once more, the bureau concluded that the battery additive had no helpful impact.

Nevertheless, NBS deviated barely from the agreed-upon parameters for the take a look at. Though the bureau had an excellent scientific motive for the minor change, Ritchie had a predictably overblown response—NBS cheated!

Then, on 18 December 1952, the Senate Choose Committee on Small Enterprise—for which Ritchie’s ally Harold Weber was consulting—issued a press launch summarizing the outcomes from the MIT assessments: AD-X2 labored! The outcomes “reveal past an affordable doubt that this materials is in truth helpful, and provides full help to the claims of the producer.” NBS was “merely psychologically incapable of giving Battery AD-X2 a good trial.”

The Nationwide Bureau of Requirements’ common assessments of battery components discovered that the merchandise didn’t work as claimed.Nationwide Institute of Requirements and Expertise Digital Collections

However the press launch distorted the MIT outcomes.The MIT assessments had targeted on diluted options and sluggish charging charges, not the traditional use situations for cars, and even then AD-X2’s influence was marginal. As soon as NBS scientists received their arms on the report, they recognized the failings within the testing.

How did the AD-X2 controversy finish?

The submit workplace lastly received round to holding its mail fraud listening to within the fall of 1952. Ritchie didn’t attend in particular person and didn’t notice his reviews wouldn’t be learn into the report with out him, which meant the listening to was decidedly one-sided in favor of NBS. On 27 February 1953, the Publish Workplace Division issued a mail fraud alert. All of Pioneers’ mail can be stopped and returned to sender stamped “fraudulent.” If this cost caught, Ritchie’s enterprise would crumble.

However one thing else occurred in the course of the fall of 1952: Dwight D. Eisenhower, operating on a pro-business platform, was elected U.S. president in a landslide.

Ritchie discovered a sympathetic ear in Eisenhower’s newly appointed Secretary of Commerce Sinclair Weeks, who acted decisively. The mail fraud alert had been issued on a Friday. Over the weekend, Weeks had a letter hand-delivered to Postmaster Basic Arthur Summerfield, one other Eisenhower appointee. By Monday, the fraud alert had been suspended.

What’s extra, Weeks discovered that Astin was “not sufficiently goal” and lacked a “enterprise perspective,” and so he requested for Astin’s resignation on 24 March 1953. Astin complied. Maybe Weeks thought this could be an earthly dismissal, simply one of many hundreds of political appointments that change arms with each new administration. That was not the case.

Greater than 400 NBS scientists—over 10 p.c of the bureau’s technical workers— threatened to resign in protest. The American Academy for the Development of Science additionally backed Astin and NBS. In an editorial revealed in Science, the AAAS referred to as the battery additive controversy itself “minor.” “The necessary subject is the truth that the independence of the scientist in his findings has been challenged, {that a} gross injustice has been carried out, and that scientific work within the authorities has been positioned in jeopardy,” the editorial acknowledged.

Nationwide Bureau of Requirements director Edward Condon [left] resigned in 1951 as a result of investigations into his political views have been impeding his capability to symbolize the bureau. Incoming director Allen V. Astin [right] inherited the AD-X2 controversy, which finally led to Astin’s dismissal after which his reinstatement after a large-scale protest by NBS researchers and others. Nationwide Institute of Requirements and Expertise Digital Collections

Clearly, AD-X2’s effectiveness was not the central subject. The controversy was a stand-in for a bigger debate in regards to the position of presidency in supporting small enterprise, the usage of science in making coverage selections, and the independence of researchers. Over the last few years, extremely revered scientists, together with Edward Condon and J. Robert Oppenheimer, had been repeatedly investigated for his or her political views. The request for Astin’s resignation was one more authorities incursion into scientific freedom.

Weeks, realizing his mistake, briefly reinstated Astin on 17 April 1953, the day the resignation was alleged to take impact. He additionally requested the Nationwide Academy of Sciences to check AD-X2 in each the lab and the sphere. By the point the academy’s report got here out in October 1953, Weeks had completely reinstated Astin. The report, unsurprisingly, concluded that NBS was right: AD-X2 had no advantage. Science had gained.

NIST makes a film

On 9 December 2023, NIST launched the 20-minute docudrama The AD-X2 Controversy. The movie gained the Finest True Story Narrative and Better of Competition on the 2023 NewsFest Movie Competition. I like to recommend taking the time to look at it.

The AD-X2 Controversywww.youtube.com

Most of the actors are NIST workers and scientists, and so they actually get into their roles. A lot of the dialogue comes verbatim from main sources, together with congressional hearings and up to date newspaper accounts.

Regardless of being an in-house manufacturing, NIST’s movie has a Hollywood connection. The movie options transient interviews with actors John and Sean Astin (of Lord of The Rings and Stranger Issues fame)—NBS director Astin’s son and grandson.

The AD-X2 controversy is simply as related immediately because it was 70 years in the past. Scientific analysis, enterprise pursuits, and politics stay deeply entangled. If the general public is to place confidence in science, it should place confidence in the integrity of scientists and the scientific methodology. I’ve no objection to science being challenged—that’s how science strikes ahead—however we have now to guarantee that neither revenue nor politics is tipping the scales.

A part of a persevering with sequence historic artifacts that embrace the boundless potential of expertise.