9 Democrat officers pleaded not responsible this week to felony election-fraud expenses in one of the vital important ballot-harvesting instances in current Texas historical past.
The fees had been introduced by Legal professional Normal Ken Paxton after a two-year investigation that uncovered what prosecutors describe as an organized scheme to control mail-in ballots in rural South Texas.
Six of the defendants appeared in individual at a Pearsall courtroom on Wednesday, whereas three others joined remotely via Zoom.
Amongst these charged is Juan Manuel Medina, the previous chairman of the Bexar County Democrat Celebration. Medina’s legal professional filed a movement to dismiss the costs, arguing that the prosecution is politically motivated, however prosecutors keep that the proof reveals a scientific effort to undermine election integrity.
WATCH: Democrats like NANCY PELOSI and LETITIA JAMES EXPOSED on The Patriot Perspective—uncovering MAJOR insider buying and selling & CORRUPTION scandals.
The indictments spotlight how deeply the alleged operation had penetrated native politics.
Earlier this yr, a Frio County grand jury indicted six officers, together with Decide Rochelle Camacho, Elections Administrator Carlos Segura, Pearsall Metropolis Council members Ramiro Trevino and Racheal Garza, Pearsall ISD Trustee Adriann Ramirez, and Rosa Rodriguez, recognized as a poll harvester.
Investigators say the group collected mail-in ballots in violation of Texas regulation, focusing on aged voters and people most reliant on mail-in voting.
Texas regulation imposes as much as ten years in jail and a $10,000 wonderful for compensated poll assortment, making the allegations in opposition to the defendants among the many most critical election-related expenses in current reminiscence.
The investigation expanded on June 30, when a second grand jury returned indictments in opposition to 9 extra people, bringing the full variety of defendants to fifteen.
Amongst them was Medina, together with Democratic Texas Home candidate Cecilia Castellano.
Castellano’s house was amongst these raided final yr when Paxton’s Legal Investigations Division executed warrants throughout Frio, Bexar, and Atascosa counties.
State brokers seized what they described as proof of an “unlawful ballot-harvesting ring” linked to a political community benefiting Democratic candidates in a number of native races. Court docket filings describe how ballots had been allegedly collected below the pretext of offering help, then submitted with out the voter’s full consent.
Investigators even allege that money and digital funds via companies like Money App had been used to safe ballots, a direct violation of Texas election regulation.
The arrests have drawn a livid response from progressive advocacy teams.
Gabriel Rosales, director of the Texas chapter of the League of United Latin American Residents, mentioned the costs ought to be thrown out and pledged that the group would stand by the accused.
Talking at a press convention, he claimed that the prosecutions had been politically motivated makes an attempt to intimidate Latino leaders in South Texas.
The size of the indictments has reignited a statewide debate over voter fraud in Texas. For years, Democrats have claimed that such instances are just about nonexistent, insisting that Republican warnings of fraud are exaggerated makes an attempt to suppress voter turnout.
But a single two-year investigation has already resulted in 15 felony indictments, together with a sitting county choose, a number of metropolis council members, and college district officers. The allegations element exactly how mail-in ballots could be exploited when chain-of-custody protections are ignored.
The fees underscore why Texas lawmakers handed sweeping election reforms in 2021, which strengthened penalties for poll harvesting and tightened procedures for mail-in voting.
Regardless of the seriousness of the allegations, Democrat leaders at each the state and nationwide stage have largely remained silent.
Republicans argue that the silence displays a double commonplace. When accusations contain Republican officers, Democrats demand speedy investigations, resignations, and new oversight guidelines.
When the defendants are Democrats, significantly in counties vital to their electoral success, there may be little acknowledgment, not to mention condemnation. The silence has fueled claims that Democrats are extra involved with preserving energy than with defending truthful elections.
The trials forward will decide whether or not the state can show its case in opposition to the defendants, however the indictments alone have already uncovered main weaknesses in how native elections have been performed.
