The FAC [First Amended Complaint] alleges a collection of occasions unfolding over the course of a number of months on campus, that are mentioned to have been precipitated by a campus tradition hostile to Jewish college students and professors. [See below for more details. -EV] The FAC says that these occasions have been perpetrated by college students who professed to oppose Zionism, however truly supposed to discriminate in opposition to Jewish college students and professors as a result of they’re Jewish. The FAC additionally alleges that Berkeley failed or refused to implement its anti-discrimination insurance policies as to its Jewish college students and college in response to those occasions.
Taken as an entire, the FAC plausibly alleges disparate therapy with discriminatory intent and coverage enforcement that’s “not typically relevant.” The FAC additionally plausibly alleges that Berkeley was intentionally detached to the on-campus harassment and hostile setting. Consequently, Brandeis’s claims beneath 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for violations of the Equal Safety and Free Train Clauses of the U.S. Structure will go ahead, as will the Title VI declare.
It bears point out that the FAC repeatedly alleges that “Zionism is a central tenet of the Jewish religion.” This raises issues about whether or not Brandeis intends to name upon the Court docket to find out the articles of religion of Judaism. In that case, a severe constitutional downside would come up. The Institution Clause correctly forbids the federal courts from saying what the tenets of a faith are. See, e.g., Our Woman of Guadalupe Sch. v. Morrissey-Berru (2020) (“The First Modification protects the appropriate of non secular establishments ‘to resolve for themselves, free from state interference, issues of … religion and doctrine.'”). This proscription is especially forceful when, as right here, there may be real disagreement on the matter.
As a result of the FAC as an entire plausibly alleges that Jewish college students and professors have been disparately handled as a result of they’re Jewish, the Court docket needn’t get into the problem now. The “Institution Clause will probably be no worse for not having been so examined.” It might be that the Court docket could correctly decide whether or not Zionism is a sincerely held non secular perception for some people, as circumstances may warrant, however the Court docket is not going to decide if it’s a central tenet of Judaism.
Here is an excerpt from components of the Criticism cited by the courtroom (following the sentence “The FAC alleges a collection of occasions unfolding over the course of a number of months on campus, that are mentioned to have been precipitated by a campus tradition hostile to Jewish college students and professors”):
[3.] On February 26, 2024, a violent scholar mob succeeded in executing its plan to forcibly shut down a talking engagement organized by Jewish college students at Berkeley. Jewish college students who had assembled to listen to the speaker, and the speaker himself, have been evacuated by police, who have been unable to forestall the mob from smashing by means of glass home windows, forcing their approach into the occasion, terrorizing Jewish college students, and bodily assaulting them. College students screamed for assist to the police. The police yelled to one another for assist. Each the scholars and the police have been overwhelmed. The mob’s anti-Semitic motives have been on full show, as when a rioter spat on a Jewish scholar and known as him a “soiled Jew.”
[4.] The organizers of the mob—Bears for Palestine, an formally acknowledged scholar group—made no secret of their plans or intent. They freely marketed their plan to close down the occasion. UC Berkeley was conscious of their plans. But, not solely did UC Berkeley fail to cease the mob from terrorizing and assaulting Jews, it has didn’t take any significant motion in opposition to Bears for Palestine because the riot. To this present day, Bears for Palestine and different teams on campus proceed to focus on and intimidate Jewish college students, forcing them to hide their Jewish identification, seclude themselves of their dorm rooms, or take circuitous routes round campus to keep away from harassment.
[5.] Beginning in early February, Sather Gate, a landmark that results in the middle of the UC Berkeley campus, has been the location of a blockade organized by a registered scholar group. The blockade has closed down the center of the gate utterly to foot visitors, leaving solely two smaller aspect paths out there to the College at giant. Though this blockade impedes all individuals equally, Jewish college students who’ve tried to move have been singled out for harassment. They’ve been spat at, known as ethnic slurs (together with “soiled Zionist”), filmed as they move, and even adopted by the organizers of the blockade. College students have been singled out for such abuse if the protestors knew them to be Jewish or in the event that they have been sporting outward indicators of their Jewish identification, reminiscent of Stars of David or yarmulkes. On account of this intimidation, Jewish college students have typically stayed house or have been compelled to take alternate routes to keep away from Sather Gate. The blockade’s results have additionally been keenly felt by the disabled group. One Jewish graduate scholar who’s blind repeatedly collided with protestors and practically fell on a number of events whereas attempting to make his approach by means of the blockade. The College was repeatedly apprised that Jewish college students are being harassed on account of the blockade and that the disabled group’s proper to equal entry was being denied. Whereas the College dedicated to ending the harassment and guarantee freedom of entry by means of the gate, these points proceed.
[6.] Sadly, the harassment and obstruction that started at Sather Gate has unfold. As of the submitting of this Amended Criticism, scholar teams have occupied the realm exterior of Sproul Corridor, an administration constructing on campus that homes the Registrar, Monetary Help, and different places of work to which college students require entry. Due to the occupation, Jewish college students report being unable to entry the constructing and being harassed after they strive to take action. One Jewish scholar was bodily assaulted when he was observing the occupation. One other Jewish scholar who was sporting a Star of David was surrounded by masked protestors, who restricted his motion whereas telling him that “Zionists can return to Europe.” Regardless of being knowledgeable of the harassment, the College has as soon as once more didn’t act. Certainly, the occupation has grown from 50 tents as of the week of April 21 to as much as not less than 175 on the time of this submitting.
[7.] The post-October 7 eruption of anti-Semitic harassment was not a brand new growth that caught the College off guard. On the contrary, anti-Semitism has been allowed to fester and develop on campus as a result of UC Berkeley has chosen for years to disregard it. In 2016, a Brandeis College analysis examine on anti-Semitism on faculty campuses discovered that over a 3rd of scholars surveyed at UC Berkeley and three different College of California (UC) campuses perceived a hostile setting towards Jews on their campuses. And in 2017, Berkeley ranked fifth in a Jewish publication’s listing of the 40 worst faculties for Jewish college students in the US and Canada. That examine famous that “Berkeley has lengthy been accused of fostering an setting that may be unfriendly to Jews and Zionists.” …
[9.] These bylaws—or another mechanism—that deal with Zionists in an inferior method to non-Zionists are a guise for anti-Semitism. This actuality is obvious from the post-October 7 harassment of Jews at UC Berkely, the place the harassers now not cover their anti-Jewish animus behind the “it is simply anti-Zionism” pretext. Jewish college students who need to take part within the organizations that adopted the Exclusionary Bylaw have been constructively expelled or barred from becoming a member of. And authorized students who’re prepared, ready, and prepared to talk to those organizations are prohibited from even competing for the chance to take action.
[10.] Though the Exclusionary Bylaw purports to focus on “Zionists,” the message, as precisely perceived by Jewish college students, is evident: Jews will not be welcome. Furthermore, whereas UC Berkeley directors have publicly acknowledged the essentially anti-Semitic nature of the Exclusionary Bylaw, they’ve regularly didn’t take motion to handle it. To this present day, scholar organizations on campus brazenly exclude Jews beneath the guise of excluding “Zionists.”
[11.] The identical anti-Semitic sentiment that animates the Exclusionary Bylaw lately unfold past the partitions of the College and invaded the house of the Dean of Berkeley Legislation, Erwin Chemerinsky. Lower than a month in the past, college students from Legislation College students for Justice in Palestine—the identical group accountable for drafting the Exclusionary Bylaw—disrupted a dinner Dean Chemerinsky was internet hosting to acknowledge and rejoice graduating college students. The protestors refused to depart when requested to take action, violating not solely College coverage however quite a few state trespass legal guidelines within the course of.
[12.] Legislation College students for Justice in Palestine had deliberate their protest prematurely, making no effort to disguise the anti-Semitic motives after they introduced their protest on Instagram. There, they posted the e-mail invitation that Dean Chemerinsky had despatched to college students along with the dates the dinners would happen and a sign-up hyperlink to attend.. The identical put up featured a grotesque caricature of Dean Chemerinsky holding a blood-soaked knife and fork with the caption, “No Dinner With Zionist Chem Whereas Gaza Starves.” The picture invoked the traditional anti-Semitic “blood libel” that Jews use the blood of non-Jewish youngsters for ritual functions. As Dean Chemerinsky acknowledged in response to the picture, “I by no means thought I might see such blatant antisemitism, with a picture that invokes the horrible antisemitic trope of blood libel and that assaults me for no obvious motive apart from I’m Jewish.” {Legislation College students for Justice in Palestine in the end took down the blood-stained caricature, changing it with an similar picture of Dean Chemerinsky, this time holding clear utensils.} On account of this disruption, Jewish college students didn’t attend further dinners that Dean Chemerinsky hosted.
[13.] The unmistakable anti-Semitism animating this “anti-Zionist” protest was acknowledged by the College as nicely. Defendant Drake, issuing an official assertion, acknowledged that “[t]he people that focused [Dean Chemerinsky’s dinner] did so just because it was hosted by a dean who’s Jewish,” and defined that the protestors’ actions “have been antisemitic, threatening, and don’t mirror the values of this college.” Josh Kraushaar (@JoshKraushaar), X (Apr.11, 2024), https://x.com/JoshKraushaar/standing/1778396582385258740. Wealthy Leib, Chair of the College of California Board of Regents echoed the identical assertion and known as the scholars’ actions “deplorable.” Jaweed Kaleem, ‘Please go away!’ A Jewish UC Berkeley dean confronts pro- Palestinian activist at his house, LOS ANGELES TIMES (Apr. 10, 2024), https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2024-04-10/uc-berkeley-law-school-dean-clashes-with- pro-palestinian-activists (“The people that focused this occasion did so just because it was hosted by a dean who’s Jewish. These actions have been antisemitic, threatening, and don’t mirror the values of this college.”).
[14.] As this incident and others clarify, the coed teams on campus accountable for this harassment equate Zionists with Jews or, on the very least, don’t differentiate between the 2. They single out Jewish college students and college for harassment (despite the fact that non-Jews who affiliate with Jews might also be Zionists), and so they goal occasions organized by Jews or Jewish organizations. Because the grotesque caricature of “Zionist Chem” made clear, they focused him not due to his views on the insurance policies of Israel—he’s a frequent critic of the present Israeli authorities and avowed supporter of Palestinian rights. Quite, they focused him as a result of he’s a Jew. Certainly, Legislation College students for Justice in Palestine—an organizing drive behind the protests on campus—affords a “Device Equipment” to its supporters that equates Zionists with Jews, defining Zionism as “[t]he declare that all folks worldwide who determine themselves as Jewish belong to a ‘Jewish nation … and that this ‘nation’ has an inherent proper to a ‘Jewish state’ in Palestine.”
[15.] The College has acknowledged that what is going on on campus violates college coverage. It has acknowledged that the incursion onto a Jewish school member’s property violated the coed code of conduct. It has admitted that the blockade of Sather Gate violated the college’s time, place, and method restrictions on campus free speech. It has acknowledged that the February 26 rioters focused Jews, even supposing the College’s authentic assertion in response to the riot omitted any reference to anti-Semitism. Dean Chemerinsky has even implicitly acknowledged that the Exclusionary Bylaw is anti-Semitic, given his recognition that Zionism is an integral a part of Jewish identification for greater than 90% of the Jewish college students on campus.
[18.] Particular cases reveal that Israelis are additionally victims of the present hate on campus. A bunch of Israelis who got here to watch the Sproul Corridor occupation have been harassed and bodily assaulted. The protestors on the occupation advised the Israelis that they need to “Return to Europe!,” that “Zionists [should stay] out of Berkeley!” and “We’ll discover the Zionists and kick them out of our courses!” Making clear that they equate Israelis with Jews (in addition to Zionists), the protestors additionally known as the Israeli college students “Talmudic devils.” One of many protestors approached one of many Israeli observers who was holding an Israeli flag, grabbed the flag, after which punched the observer thrice within the head. The observer acquired medical take care of his accidents.
[19.] A visiting Israeli professor had her invitation to return and educate on the college revoked given “every part that is taking place on campus.” The professor indicated that she had heard there was “huge stress from the school, particularly from the livid grasp’s diploma college students, to not deliver anyone from Israel and to not maintain programs coping with Israel.” …
