President Donald Trump, who imposed punitive tariffs on Mexico this week, complains that our southern neighbor just isn’t doing sufficient to cease unlawful medication from crossing the border. Mexico has an analogous criticism about the US, as mirrored in a case the Supreme Courtroom heard the identical day the tariffs took impact.
Formally, the Mexican authorities sued American gun producers, blaming them for “aiding and abetting” the trafficking of firearms to drug cartels. However its actual beef is with the Second Modification, which prohibits the form of sweeping gun restrictions that Mexican officers suppose public security requires.
Though the Mexican Structure notionally protects “the fitting to maintain arms at dwelling,” it offers the federal government large latitude to resolve which firearms civilians might personal. Mexicans can legally purchase licensed weapons from solely a single outlet in Mexico Metropolis, all firearms should be registered with the federal government, and permission to hold weapons in public for self-defense is sort of unattainable to acquire.
In the US, in contrast, the Structure ensures “the fitting of the individuals to maintain and bear arms,” which the Supreme Courtroom has mentioned guidelines out insurance policies corresponding to banning handguns or requiring that folks reveal a “particular want” to hold them outdoors the house. The Courtroom additionally has mentioned the Second Modification covers weapons “in widespread use” for “lawful functions like self-defense.”
Smith & Wesson, one of many gun makers sued by the Mexican authorities, says that distinction is the subtext of this case. The lawsuit, it notes, seeks not solely $10 billion in damages but in addition “intensive injunctive aid imposing new gun-control measures in the US,” together with “common background checks,” bans on “assault weapons” and magazines that maintain greater than 10 rounds, and “strict limits on ‘a number of gross sales’ of firearms.”
Mexico “makes no secret that it abhors this nation’s method to firearms,” Smith & Wesson says. “In essence, Mexico seeks to make use of Mexican tort legal guidelines to control how firearms are made and offered in the US.”
The principle barrier to that technique is a 2005 federal regulation that usually bars tort claims in opposition to gun producers, distributors, or sellers based mostly on “the legal or illegal misuse” of their merchandise. Final 12 months, the U.S. Courtroom of Appeals for the first Circuit nonetheless allowed Mexico’s lawsuit to proceed based mostly on an exception to that rule.
The exception applies when a enterprise “knowingly” violates a state or federal gun regulation and that violation “was a proximate reason behind the hurt for which aid is sought.” But Mexico doesn’t allege that gun producers didn’t adjust to any related state or federal laws.
As an alternative, Mexico objects to longstanding, completely authorized enterprise practices that it says have inspired and enabled drug cartels to acquire American-made firearms. These practices, Smith & Wesson notes, embrace manufacturing and selling “America’s hottest rifle, the AR-15”; producing “large-capacity” magazines, “that are in actual fact standard-capacity magazines”; and taking part within the federally licensed three-tier gun distribution system, by which producers promote firearms to wholesalers that provide them to retailers.
In keeping with the lawsuit, producers ought to have foreseen that some portion of these weapons—about 2 %, Smith & Wesson estimates—would find yourself in Mexico, and they need to have executed extra to stop that consequence. That idea of legal responsibility, Smith & Wesson says, quantities to “an eight-step Rube Goldberg” contraption that stretches the that means of “proximate trigger” and “aiding and abetting” past recognition.
Mexico maintains that U.S. gun producers have been brazenly and knowingly breaking the regulation for many years. In that case, it’s a thriller why no regulation enforcement company has ever held them to account.
This lawsuit goals to reshape the U.S. gun business straight, by way of a court docket order forbidding the practices that offend Mexico. It additionally goals to take action not directly by reviving a legal responsibility risk that Congress rightly acknowledged as a hazard to the constitutional rights that firearm producers allow People to train.
© Copyright 2025 by Creators Syndicate Inc.
