(From left) BJ Pascual, Denise Julia and Killa Kush. Pictures: Josh Tolentino through Instagram/@bjpascual, @denisejvlia, @killakushla
Even Christmas was not spared from the drama that stemmed between Denise Julia, BJ Pascual and Killa Kush because the three-way feud made headlines in what was speculated to be a festive season.
The controversial spat stemmed from Pascual making claims about Denise’s alleged “unprofessionalism,” which was agreed on by the content material creator.
Nevertheless, the feud — which included a number of screenshots posted on December 25 — escalated with the R&B singer hinting at taking the battle to court docket.
Curious how the feud started? Don’t miss out on the small print behind their controversial spat, in addition to different trending leisure headlines from December 20 to 26.
Begin of Denise Julia, BJ Pascual and Killa Kush’s feud
Denise Julia and BJ Pascual | Picture: Instagram/@denisejvlia, @bjpascual
The spat between Denise Julia, BJ Pascual and Killa Kush started after the celeb photographer revealed that the singer-songwriter was his “worst celeb expertise” on Killa Kush’s “Unhealthy B*tch Bible” podcast.
Article continues after this commercial
“Nanggigigil pa din ako,” Pascual started. “Si Denise Julia. I’ve heard so many issues about her,” he started.
Article continues after this commercial
“I suppose medyo kasalanan ko rin that I nonetheless took the job, and it was extra like a ardour venture as a result of her supervisor JV (Denise Julia’s supervisor) known as me many instances, like, would message me on Instagram, and so we had a gathering,” he admitted.
Pascual detailed his expertise being requested to work on Denise’s album cowl and music video, after which the latter’s staff questioned the bills and canceling them.
“Ang babayaran na lang nila is manpower and supplies. There isn’t a expertise payment. That is charity work na,” he stated. “Sabi ng supervisor ko, ‘They need to cancel daw the shoot.’ The rationale was nag-flake daw ‘yung hairstylist nila.”
“Lady… This was already 10 PM. Ang name time namin is 6 AM [the next day]. Sya [Denise] 8 AM. What number of hours na lang earlier than the shoot? We now have been setting the set since 4 PM,” he added.
Pascual additionally shared that Denise’s camp additionally declined to pay the cancellation payment, whereas including that he ended up taking pictures one other celeb for the set in order to not go to waste.
“After that, I by no means heard from her. No thanks, no sorry, no something. No ‘what occurred?’ Nothing,” he recalled.
Denise Julia claps again at BJ’s claims of ‘unprofessionalism’
Denise Julia and BJ Pascual. Picture: Instagram/@denisejvlia, @bjpascual
Denise Julia spoke up on BJ Pascual’s claims of “unprofessionalism” towards her, clarifying that it was the photographer’s staff who canceled their scheduled shoot on account of their “variations in manufacturing processes.”
She made a tell-all through her Instagram Tales on Christmas Day, together with in her posts the screenshots of her supervisor’s dialog with Pascual’s supervisor relating to the shoot.
In keeping with the singer-songwriter, her staff reached out to Pascual again in Might, and so they had an internet assembly in June, and so they additionally had private calls to alternate concepts for the shoot.
In July, Denise’s supervisor gave a funds of P650,000.
However Pascual’s staff—regardless of the previous “following up many instances”—didn’t instantly get again to the singer’s staff if the “funds is doable.”
“We are able to’t actually have a shoot date with out us being certain if the funds is even possible to them. As a result of on our finish, we perceive if this isn’t one thing they will work with,” she stated.
“We’d have pulled again instantly already from the beginning if that they had solely informed us that this isn’t doable for them, that that’s not the worth vary they will work with,” she famous.
Nevertheless, three days earlier than the shoot and already three weeks after Denise’s staff despatched their preliminary funds, Pascual’s staff, in accordance with Denise, despatched a value sheet of P1.2 million.
The singer’s staff tried to increase their funds to P800,000 as a result of they “actually needed to do that.”
Her supervisor gave out choices in order that “not one of the efforts go to waste,” though Pascual’s staff was solely in a position to alter the price to P1 million two days earlier than the shoot.
Denise then confirmed a screenshot of the dialog between her supervisor and Pascual’s, by which the singer’s supervisor identified that from expertise, “no distributors would do something and not using a funds really agreed upon.”
“I believe that’s the place the confusion is,” Denise’s supervisor stated within the screenshot.
“I ought to have been extra easy with how essential it was that we agreed on a quantity earlier than confirming something. I believed that was a protocol for y’all as properly so I apologize for me assuming that’s the case,” the supervisor regretted.
Pascual’s supervisor then replied, “Okay, so because of the variations in our manufacturing processes. I believe it might be greatest to cancel the shoot.”
Denise added that her supervisor had urged pushing the shoot to a later date. “However finally on the finish, BJ’s staff, not us, canceled the shoot.”
“I’m absolutely acknowledging my mistake for not reaching out after this anymore, but it surely was as a result of I didn’t know the extent of his frustration till every thing aired on social media and it blew off proportion,” Denise stated.
Denise Julia threatens authorized motion vs Killa Kush
Denise Julia (left) and Killa Kush | Picture: Instagram/@denisejvlia, @killakushla
Aside from BJ Pascual, Denise Julia can be voicing her grievances towards Killa Kush (additionally identified by her actual title Acushla Obusan), with a risk to file prices.
On Christmas Day, Kush took to her Instagram tales to precise her “devastation” over how her current podcast episode with Pascual sparked controversy after they aired their expertise with Denise.
She shared the context and screenshots of her dialog with the singer and her staff about their previous collaboration.
“It’s actually devastating how this has performed out. I may play the receipts recreation all day lengthy with all our tasks since 2022, but it surely’s actually Christmas day,” Kush stated.
“As a collaborator, I’ve already spent 400K mounting her first album launch occasion with no down fee (and needed to fulfill every thing in 4 days), then received paid over a month after,” she wrote.
Kush disclosed extra particulars on the monetary harm their earlier podcast collaboration supposedly generated.
As Kush detailed the trouble and bills she supposedly shelled out for Denise, she emphasised that airing her aspect of the story is an try to open the dialog about professionalism.
“As a number, my questions and feedback on the podcast had been by no means meant to disgrace anybody however quite to open up the dialog on challenges within the artistic business,” she stated.
“I hope this dialogue results in extra accountability and professionalism. My focus is to proceed sparking significant conversations and difficult minds,” she identified, noting that she doesn’t need to drop extra screenshots.
After her assertion, Denise took to X (previously Twitter) to warn Kush about pursuing authorized motion, as she described the latter’s statements as a “twisted narrative.”
“Hope you may again up all that once I see you in court docket,” Denise warned. “‘Test her tales’ and it’s all twisted narrative as regular with enterprise that was between her and a label staff; receipts are simply her trash-talking behind me and my greatest buddy.”
Denise alleged cases of unprofessionalism on Kush’s half, together with late funds for expertise charges, exploitative use of her title and picture for promotional functions, and even inappropriate habits throughout their preliminary encounters.
The singer additionally shared a personal dialog between her and Kush, stressing her intent to take the difficulty to court docket.
“Lols. Biglang bait,” she captioned the screenshot.
BJ says Denise Julia’s screenshots ‘don’t mirror full context’
BJ Pascual. Picture: Instagram/@bjpascual
BJ Pascual clarified elements of the screenshots earlier made public by Denise Julia, stressing that he doesn’t need to escalate the difficulty however that he simply desires to “present transparency and accountability.”
Pascual, who not too long ago named the singer because the worst celeb he labored with, responded to Denise’s tell-all about their canceled shoot by sharing screenshots as properly of the elements of the dialog between them.
“I admire Denise’s current efforts to handle the scenario and the dialog we had within the hopes of shifting ahead,” he stated through his Instagram Tales on Christmas Day.
“Nevertheless, some claims and parts of the photographs she shared on her IG tales don’t mirror the complete context of what transpired,” he seen.
One of many factors Pascual raised is that his staff was supposedly in a position to minimize the price of the shoot to accommodate the funds of the group of Denise.
To assist his assertion, Pascual added a screenshot of the price sheet his staff despatched to the singer’s supervisor.
“Our staff made each effort to regulate the funds all the way down to 371K for the one-day shoot, which was under business requirements,” he stated.
“This was a part of our effort to accommodate their funds and match inside their particular vary, opposite to the unique P1.2M quantity that Denise shared in her IG story. A element that was not absolutely addressed in her video,” he defined.
Pascual famous that after giving Denise’s staff the discounted value, the latter informed them that they had been “not prepared” on account of their glam staff canceling on them.
He stated that they had managed to safe one other glam staff for the singer, however her staff “nonetheless felt unprepared.”
“My intention in sharing the context is to not escalate the matter however to offer transparency and accountability… I hope this brings readability and closure to the matter, permitting us to maneuver ahead constructively,” he stated.
“I’ve already responded personally to Denise yesterday, acknowledging her message and expressing my openness to resolving this additional in individual.”
Denise Julia mulls defamation go well with vs BJ Pascual
Denise Julia and BJ Pascual. Picture: Instagram/@denisejvlia, @bjpascual
After disclosing their personal conversations relating to their canceled shoot, Denise Julia and BJ Pascual look like heading to a authorized battle.
This may apparently be the case because the singer expressed intent to file a defamation go well with towards the photographer, as per her assertion on her X web page on Christmas Day.
Her put up—which features a display recording of their managers’ full dialog—got here after Pascual made clarifications and shared extra pictures of their groups’ dialog to offer “full context.”
“We went into this eager to work with you—we’re real followers and had been so excited concerning the collaboration,” she stated.
“From the very starting, we had been upfront about our funds and what we are able to afford to execute the music video, the picture shoot, the album artwork, the trailer and press pictures,” she burdened.
“I had moved my total launch date simply to have the ability to work with you, out of respect to your time. I’ve stayed quiet for so long as I may, however I wanted to say my piece,” she continued.
Denise reiterated that her supervisor tried to make the negotiation between her and Pascual’s staff work in order that “nobody’s effort goes to waste.”
“You focused me to convey me down,” Denise addressed Pascual. “I believed this was one thing we had agreed to speak about in individual… We are actually involved with our authorized staff a few defamation go well with. I hate that this needed to go this fashion when it didn’t need to.”
Pascual has but to remark, as of press time.
MJ Lastimosa will get dragged into ‘infidelity’ scandal
MJ Lastimosa on the media convention and pink carpet premiere of “Unusual Frequencies: Taiwan Killer Hospital” on Thursday, Dec. 19. | Picture: INQUIRER.web/Jessica Ann Evangelista
MJ Lastimosa was in disbelief after studying that her title was dragged into an “infidelity” scandal involving influencer Small Laude’s husband entrepreneur Philip Laude.
Throughout the media con and pink carpet premiere of “Unusual Frequencies: Taiwan Killer Hospital” final Dec. 19, Lastimosa was requested if she was conscious that her title was not too long ago talked about within the viral screenshots involving the intimate exchanges between Philip and her alleged mistress.
Within the now-deleted screenshots, Philip was supposedly assuring a girl named Treasured Mae Larra that she shouldn’t get jealous of a girl named “MJ” as a result of they weren’t an merchandise, on the identical time making an attempt to “belittle” MJ’s traits.
“Pinagselosan ako? Saan? Hindi ako conscious,” she stated as reporters stuffed her in with the knowledge.
“Ang first and final encounter ko with them [Laudes] was in L.A. Nung na-invite ako sa mansion nila. After that, wala naman nangyari. Bakit ako?” she requested.
“Nakilala ko si Ma’am Small and Sir Philip and the household. Lahat sila. Pumasok kami tapos kumakain na sila. Ayun lang. Hello, hey. Mga one hour. That was it. Paano ako nadamay dyan?” Lastimosa puzzled with amusement.
Lastimosa was in utter confusion as reporters stuffed her in with extra particulars concerning the concern. “Pero ako ba talaga? Eh, hindi naman kami magkakilala. Positive ba kayong ako ‘yon?” she queried.
“Mamaya naman… or baka kasi might mga relationship din na mga selosa lang talaga ‘yung companion. Pero hindi nya naman companion ‘yun, di ba?” she remarked.
Lastimosa was additionally requested for her response, realizing that Philip allegedly “downgraded” her look.
“Grabe. I like being maitim. Hindi ko sya kinakahiya. Nagbe-beach nga ako para umitim pa lalo,” she stated. “[Pero] sa pageantry, usong uso naman ‘yang laitan. Parang wala na sa ‘kin ‘yan.”
“Basta ako, naniniwala akong maganda ako. Basta pagtingin mo sa salamin, assured ka, okay na po ‘yon,” she maintained.
Lastimosa stated she would search for the screenshots to see them for herself.
In the meantime, Philip and Small Laude have remained quiet concerning the allegations.
Blake Vigorous accuses Justin Baldoni of sexual harassment
Blake Vigorous and Justin Baldoni. Picture: Scott A Garfitt, Evan Agostini/Invision/AP, File
Blake Vigorous has accused her “It Ends With Us” director and co-star Justin Baldoni of sexual harassment on the set of the film and a subsequent effort to “destroy” her popularity in a authorized criticism.
The criticism obtained by The Related Press, which The New York Occasions reported was filed on Dec. 20 with the California Civil Rights Division, precedes a lawsuit.
It names Baldoni, the studio behind the romantic drama “It Ends With Us,” and Baldoni’s publicists among the many defendants.
Within the criticism, Vigorous accuses Baldoni and the studio of embarking on a “multi-tiered plan” to wreck her popularity.
This alleged plot adopted a gathering by which she and her husband Ryan Reynolds addressed “repeated sexual harassment and different disturbing habits” by Baldoni and a producer on the film.
The scheme, the criticism stated, included a proposal to plant theories on on-line message boards, engineer a social media marketing campaign, and place information tales important of Vigorous.
Baldoni enlisted publicists and disaster managers in a “subtle, coordinated and well-financed retaliation plan” meant to “bury” and “destroy” Vigorous if she went public together with her on-set issues, the criticism alleges.
“To safeguard towards the chance of Ms. Vigorous ever revealing the reality about Mr. Baldoni, the Baldoni-Wayfarer staff created, planted, amplified and boosted content material designed to eviscerate Ms. Vigorous’s credibility,” the criticism states.
“They engaged in the identical strategies to bolster Mr. Baldoni’s credibility and suppress any adverse content material about him,” the doc reads.
The criticism additionally says Baldoni “abruptly pivoted away from” the film’s advertising plan and “used home violence ‘survivor content material’ to guard his public picture.”
Bryan Freedman, an legal professional representing Baldoni, Wayfarer Studios and its representatives, known as the claims “utterly false, outrageous and deliberately salacious.”
He pushed again towards Vigorous’s allegations of a coordinated marketing campaign, saying the studio “proactively” employed a disaster supervisor “because of the a number of calls for and threats made by Ms. Vigorous throughout manufacturing.”
Freedman additionally stated Vigorous threatened to not seem on set and to not promote the movie “if her calls for weren’t met.”
These calls for weren’t specified within the assertion, however Vigorous’s criticism lists 30 calls for that she stated Baldoni and others agreed to after their tense sit-down over her hostile work setting issues.
“It Ends With Us,” an adaptation of Colleen Hoover’s bestselling 2016 novel, was launched in August, exceeding field workplace expectations with a $50 million debut.
However the film’s launch was shrouded by hypothesis over a discord between the lead pair.
Your subscription couldn’t be saved. Please attempt once more.
Your subscription has been profitable.
Baldoni took a backseat in selling the movie whereas Vigorous took centerstage together with Reynolds, who was on the press circuit for “Deadpool & Wolverine” on the identical time.
